<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cardiophile MD &#187; Cardiac CT scan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cardiophile.org/category/cardiac-ct-scan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cardiophile.org</link>
	<description>Devoted to Cardiovascular Profession</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Accessory renal arteries on CT renal angio</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/accessory-renal-arteries-on-ct-renal-angio/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/accessory-renal-arteries-on-ct-renal-angio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=7349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accessory renal arteries on CT renal angio Picture is from a three dimensional reconstruction of a 64 slice CT (computerized tomography) renal angiogram. Aorta, multiple renal arteries and [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl id="attachment_8915">
<dt><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Accesory-renal-arteries.jpg"><br />
<img title="Accesory renal arteries" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Accesory-renal-arteries.jpg" alt="" width="367" height="289" /></a></dt>
<dd>Accessory renal arteries on CT renal angio</dd>
</dl>
<p>Picture is from a three dimensional reconstruction of a 64 slice CT (computerized tomography) renal angiogram. Aorta, multiple renal arteries and both kidneys are seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/accessory-renal-arteries-on-ct-renal-angio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abdominal aortic dissection on CT scan</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/abdominal-aortic-dissection-on-ct-scan/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/abdominal-aortic-dissection-on-ct-scan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=7277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abdominal aortic dissection on CT scan Cross sectional image of aortic dissection seen on CT scan at the level of the kidneys, which are seen on either side [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Abd-aortic-dissection-cross-section.jpg"><br />
<img title="Abdominal aortic dissection" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Abd-aortic-dissection-cross-section.jpg" alt="" width="490" height="310" /></a></p>
<p>Abdominal aortic dissection on CT scan</p>
<p>Cross sectional image of aortic dissection seen on CT scan at the level of the kidneys, which are seen on either side of the vertebral column. The arrow marks the dissection with two lumens seen on either side of the flap.  No thrombus is seen in either lumen. In isolated abdominal aortic dissection, if there is no compromise of major vascular ostia, the management is conservative with control of hypertension, which is usually present. Prosthetic replacement of the involved aorta and endovascular therapy are other options.</p>
<p>Primary abdominal aortic dissection is rare and usually about two percent. More and more cases are now being detected by CT scans taken for evaluation of abdominal pain. In those cases without involvement of major branches, this is probably more likely. In most cases, abdominal aortic dissection occurs as an extension of thoracic aortic dissection. Aortic dissection originates in the ascending aorta most often (about seventy percent), less often in the descending aorta (about one fifth of cases) and a few cases in arch of aorta (seven percent of cases) [Borioni R et al. Abdominal Aortic Dissections. Anatomic and Clinical Features and Therapeutic Options. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005; 32: 70–73].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/abdominal-aortic-dissection-on-ct-scan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coronary CT (computerised tomography) angiography</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/coronary-ct-computerised-tomography-angiography/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/coronary-ct-computerised-tomography-angiography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=7206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multi slice CT for coronary artery imaging Multi slice CT (MSCT) scanners are becoming popular as a non-invasive imaging modality for screening coronary artery disease. The era of [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Multi slice CT for coronary artery imaging</strong></p>
<p>Multi slice CT (MSCT) scanners are becoming popular as a non-invasive imaging modality for screening coronary artery disease. The era of MSCT started with 4 slice scanners and progressed to the 64 slice MSCT which is commonly used now. 256 slice and 320 slice CT scanners are also being evaluated for clinical use. One of the difficulties with cardiac CT for imaging coronaries is the constant motion of the heart. This can be partly overcome by using ECG gating of the signals. Conventionally this has been done by retrospective ECG gating. This would mean that CT data is acquired through out the cardiac cycle and only those signals during a particular part of the cardiac cycle, usually a diastolic frame is used for final reconstruction of the coronaries. This would mean a much higher dose of radiation. Now prospective ECG gating is being evaluated in MSCT to reduce the radiation dose so that data acquisition is done only during the selected phase of the cardiac cycle. Prospective ECG gating can reduce the radiation dose up to 90% as compared to retrospective ECG gating. But the quality of images will come down if the heart rate or heart rate variability is high in prospective ECG gating. So also, higher body mass index (BMI) also causes lower image quality. Prospective gating can cause stair step artefacts due to patient motion on the CT table as multiple acquisitions may be needed to cover the z-axis with 64 slice CT. This is avoided in 320 slice CT as the gantry can cover the whole heart in one cycle due to better z-axis coverage. Dual source CT also gives better results.</p>
<p>Imaging of the coronaries is ideally done at lower heart rates and beta blockers are often administered to lower the heart rate during MSCT if the basal heart rate is high. As the number of slices increased, the resolution of the system to pick up more and more details of the coronary anatomy has improved. Main coronary arteries as well as side branches can be visualised well with ECG gated 64 slice CT. 320 slice CT will improve the quality of images further. The whole imaging can be completed in one cardiac cycle, even with prospective ECG gating. This would mean that patients with cardiac arrhythmias are no longer excluded from cardiac CT evaluation of the coronaries.</p>
<p><strong>64-Slice computed tomography angiography has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value</strong></p>
<p>64-Slice computed tomography angiography as diagnostic tool in coronary artery disease has been evaluated in a meta analysis by Mowatt et al (Heart 2008;94:1386-1393). Of the 40 studies identified, 28 had sufficient data for incusion in the meta analysis. The studies included were those comparing 64-Slice computed tomography angiography with standard coronary angiography. The pooled data offered a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 89% taking 50% or more coronary stenosis as a cut off point. The median positive predictive value across studies was 93% (range 64–100%) and negative predictive value 100% (range 86–100%).</p>
<p>The authors suggest that 64-Slice computed tomography angiography may have a role in the assessment of undiagnosed chest pain when simple non-invasive investigations are non-diagnostic and can rule out significant coronary artery disease in this context.</p>
<p><strong>Cardiac CT images of coronary arteries</strong></p>
<h4><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/LAD-and-RCAs.jpg"><img title="LAD and RCA" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/LAD-and-RCAs.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="315" /></a>Cardiac CT scan image of LAD and RCA</h4>
<p>Cardiac CT scan image of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and right coronary artery (RCA). Ao: aorta. Though the distal LAD appears tapered, it could be due to change in the plane as this is only a tomographic section and not a total angiographic image of the LAD. Proximal RCA is seen well. Only a short portion of the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) is seen arising from the left main coronary artery (LMCA) [not marked] just beyond the aorta (Ao).</p>
<h4><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/LCX-in-AV-groove.jpg"><img title="LCX in AV groove" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/LCX-in-AV-groove.jpg" alt="" width="467" height="306" /></a>Cardiac CT scan image of LCX</h4>
<p>Cardiac CT scan image of left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery in the atrioventricular (AV) groove, seen arising from the aorta (A0). Though only a short segment of the LCX is seen in the previous view, a good extent is seen in this section. Hence caution has to be exerted before committing that a short segment visualised is the stump of an occluded artery as the segments may become invisible when the plane of imaging changes in tomographic images.</p>
<h4><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/LCX-and-RCA.jpg"><img title="LCX and RCA" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/LCX-and-RCA.jpg" alt="" width="388" height="392" /></a>Cardiac CT scan image of LM, LCX and RCA</h4>
<p>Cardiac CT scan image of left  main coronary artery (LM), left circumflex (CX) coronary artery and right coronary artery (RCA). The left main and RCA are seen arising from the left and right coronary sinuses of the aorta (Ao). The non coronary sinus of the aorta from which no coronary artery arises is also seen. These are the sinuses of Valsalva.</p>
<h4><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RCA.jpg"><img title="RCA" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RCA.jpg" alt="" width="478" height="310" /></a>Cardiac CT image of right coronary artery</h4>
<p>Cardiac CT image of right coronary artery (RCA), seen almost to the full extent, including the bifurcation. Right ventricular branch is also seen. The cross sections of the left ventricle and aorta are seen filled with contrast. A portion of the left coronary system is also seen incompletely on the right side of the image (not marked).</p>
<p><strong>Normal cardiac CT images: Coronaries on reconstructed views</strong></p>
<p>Cardiac CT angiograms are increasing in popularity as a non-invasive screening tool for detecting significant coronary artery disease. The angiograms are reconstructions from 64 or more slice CT scans following intravenous injection of radiocontrast dye. As of now it cannot replace conventional coronary angiograms for assessing the detailed coronary anatomy.</p>
<h4><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LCX-and-LAD.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7210" title="LCX-and-LAD" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LCX-and-LAD.jpg" alt="" width="339" height="472" /></a></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: center;">LAD, LCX and Left main on reconstructed cardiac CT</h4>
<p>Reconstructed cardiac CT scan image as viewed from the left anterior aspect, showing left main (LM) left main coronary artery, left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Ao: aorta. Two diagonal branches are also seen arising from the LAD. LCX is occupying the atrioventricular (AV) groove.</p>
<h4><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LCX-and-coronary-sinus.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7211" title="LCX-and-coronary-sinus" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LCX-and-coronary-sinus.jpg" alt="" width="345" height="359" /></a></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: center;">LMCA, LAD, LCX and coronary sinus on reconstructed cardiac CT</h4>
<p>Reconstructed cardiac CT image as viewed from the posterior aspect showing the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, left main coronary artery (LMCA), left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery and the coronary sinus (Coron sinus). The main tributaries of the coronary sinus are also seen joining it. A diagonal branch is seen arising from the LAD and an obtuse marginal branch from the LCX (not marked).</p>
<h4></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/RCA-in-AV-groove.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7212" title="RCA-in-AV-groove" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/RCA-in-AV-groove.jpg" alt="" width="443" height="321" /></a>RCA in the AV groove on reconstructed cardiac CT</h4>
<p>Reconstructed cardiac CT image showing the right coronary artery (RCA) in the atrioventricular (AV) groove. The structure to the left of the RCA is the right atrium and that to the left is left ventricle. The left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery is seen to the left extreme of the image, though it is not visualised well. A diagonal branch of the LAD is also visible.</p>
<h4><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Distal-RCA-and-coronary-sinus.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7213" title="Distal-RCA-and-coronary-sinus" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Distal-RCA-and-coronary-sinus.jpg" alt="" width="437" height="394" /></a></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: center;">Distal RCA and coronary sinus on on reconstructed cardiac CT</h4>
<p>Distal right coronary artery (RCA) and coronary sinus seen in the atrioventricular (AV) groove seen on the posterior aspect view of reconstructed cardiac CT. Left circumflex coronary is seen adjacent the coronary sinus in the AV groove.</p>
<p><strong>Uninterpretable risk score for coronary CT angiography</strong></p>
<p>Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is being used increasingly as a screening tool for coronary artery disease (CAD) in those with an intermediate or low risk for CAD. Acquisition of good quality images is an important factor in the success of coronary CT angiography. But in some individuals, this may not be possible due to various reasons. Vanhecke TE and associates {Vanhecke TE et al. Development and Validation of a Predictive Screening Tool for Uninterpretable Coronary CT Angiography Results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul 20. [Epub ahead of print]} have developed an uninterpretable risk score using clinical and patient variables. They identified variables which were independently associated with the occurrence of at least one uninterpretable major coronary segment, using data from over eight thousand five hundred patients. This was then prospectively validated among nine hundred odd patients. The scores ranged from zero to twelve. The risk score was predictive of uninterpretable results in both the development and validation cohorts used in the study. The seven factors which constitute the uninterpretable risk score are diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sedentary lifestyle, body mass index, age, and history of atrial fibrillation. The authors conclude that the scoring system may help in predicting those in whom the unnecessary radiation exposure due to the study may be avoided if the risk score suggests uninterpretable results.</p>
<p><strong>Risk of coronary event with non obstructive plaques</strong></p>
<p>Non obstructive coronary plaques need not percutaneous coronary interventions, but some of them may lead on to acute coronary events later on. The calcified plaques may not lead on to events, but the vulnerable plaques with a lipid rich core and a thin fibrous cap are the ones prone for fissuring of the cap or rupture which leads an intra coronary thrombus formation and a consequent acute coronary event.</p>
<p>Kristensen TS and associates [Kristensen TS et al. Prognostic Implications of Nonobstructive Coronary Plaques in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Multidetector Computed Tomography Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011; 58:502-509] evaluated non obstructive coronary plaques in those with non ST elevation myocardial infarction and followed them up. Over three hundred patients were underwent 64 slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography and coronary artery calcium scoring before conventional coronary angiography. Plaque composition and volume were measured quantitatively for all non obstructive coronary lesions. Standard guideline based invasive treatment was given. Twenty three patients had a cardiac event at a median follow up of sixteen months. Increasing amount of non calcified plaque was associated with age, male sex and diabetes mellitus. Total volume of non calcified plaque was independently associated with an increased hazard ratio. But Agatston score or the amount of calcium in the non obstructive lesions were not associated with increased risk.</p>
<p><strong>Multicolour CT and gold nanoparticles for evaluation of plaque</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Multicolor CT is the popular name for spectral computed tomography. In spectral CT system, the incident x-rays are divided into multiple energy bins and is used for multicolour imaging. Gold high density nanoparticle contrast agent (Au-HDL) can be used for characterization of macrophage burden as they are taken up by the macrophages in the atherosclerotic plaques. A recent study published in Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):774-82 by Cormode DP et al  evaluated the use of gold nanoparticles along with multicolour CT in animal studies of atherosclerotic plaques. Multi colour CT enabled differentiation of gold nanoparticles, iodine based contrast and calcium phosphate. Gold nanoparticles were located primarily in the macrophages in the aortic sections. This combined imaging enabled characterisation of stenosis by the plaques, calcification and the macrophage burden. Macrophage rich plaques are considered as vulnerable plaques prone for rupture and producing vascular events like acute coronary syndrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/coronary-ct-computerised-tomography-angiography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Myocardial contrast delayed enhancement with 64-slice multidetector CT after acute MI</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/myocardial-contrast-delayed-enhancement-with-64-slice-multidetector-ct-after-acute-mi/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/myocardial-contrast-delayed-enhancement-with-64-slice-multidetector-ct-after-acute-mi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=6910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sato A et al have assessed the role of myocardial contrast delayed enhancement with 64-slice multidetector computerized tomography (MDCT) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in prediction of clinical [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sato A et al have assessed the role of myocardial contrast delayed enhancement with 64-slice multidetector computerized tomography (MDCT) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in prediction of clinical outcome [Prognostic Value of Myocardial Contrast Delayed Enhancement With 64-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012; 59:730-738]. Among the 102 patients, nine died and twelve had heart failure during the study period. The size of delayed enhancement on myocardial contrast CT was found to be a significant independent predictor for cardiac events after adjustment for TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) risk score, left ventricular ejection fraction and total defect score on technetium scan. The study was performed immediately after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MDCT was performed immediately after the final check angio of PCI procedure without administering any further contrast for the CT. Repeat angiograms were performed at six months after the PCI. Infarct area was defined as a hyperenhancement with a signal intensity higher than two standard deviations above the mean signal intensity of normal myocardium remote from the infarct location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2012/04/myocardial-contrast-delayed-enhancement-with-64-slice-multidetector-ct-after-acute-mi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uninterpretable risk score for coronary CT angiography</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/uninterpretable-risk-score-for-coronary-ct-angiography/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/uninterpretable-risk-score-for-coronary-ct-angiography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=6600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is being used increasingly as a screening tool for coronary artery disease (CAD) in those with an intermediate or low risk for CAD. Acquisition [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is being used increasingly as a screening tool for coronary artery disease (CAD) in those with an intermediate or low risk for CAD. Acquisition of good quality images is an important factor in the success of coronary CT angiography. But in some individuals, this may not be possible due to various reasons. Vanhecke TE and associates {Vanhecke TE et al. Development and Validation of a Predictive Screening Tool for Uninterpretable Coronary CT Angiography Results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul 20. [Epub ahead of print]} have developed an uninterpretable risk score using clinical and patient variables. They identified variables which were independently associated with the occurrence of at least one uninterpretable major coronary segment, using data from over eight thousand five hundred patients. This was then prospectively validated among nine hundred odd patients. The scores ranged from zero to twelve. The risk score was predictive of uninterpretable results in both the development and validation cohorts used in the study. The  seven factors which constitute the uninterpretable risk score are diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sedentary lifestyle, body mass index, age, and history of atrial fibrillation. The authors conclude that the scoring system may help in predicting those in whom the unnecessary radiation exposure due to the study may be avoided if the risk score suggests uninterpretable results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/uninterpretable-risk-score-for-coronary-ct-angiography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Role of computed tomography (CT) in GUCH</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/role-of-computed-tomography-ct-in-guch/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/role-of-computed-tomography-ct-in-guch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=6591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Computed tomography (CT) provides excellent spatial resolution and has a rapid acquisition time. It is good for imaging arteries and veins. CT is superior to cardiac magnetic resonance [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computed tomography (CT) provides excellent spatial resolution and has a rapid acquisition time. It is good for imaging arteries and veins. CT is superior to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for visualising the epicardial coronary arteries, their collaterals and arteriovenous (AV) malformations. CT can also be used to assess the size of the ventricles and their function, but has an inferior temporal resolution compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. As it is well known, the major drawback of computed tomography is the radiation risk, which cannot be avoided. Contrast related issues like the small but real  potential for contrast nephropathy, allergic reactions, transient myocardial suppression and thrombotic possibility in a dehydrated polycythemic patient should also be given due consideration. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/role-of-computed-tomography-ct-in-guch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk of coronary event with non obstructive plaques</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/risk-of-coronary-event-with-non-obstructive-plaques/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/risk-of-coronary-event-with-non-obstructive-plaques/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=6415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Non obstructive coronary plaques need not percutaneous coronary interventions, but some of them may lead on to acute coronary events later on. The calcified plaques may not lead [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non obstructive coronary plaques need not percutaneous coronary interventions, but some of them may lead on to acute coronary events later on. The calcified plaques may not lead on to events, but the vulnerable plaques with a lipid rich core and a thin fibrous cap are the ones prone for fissuring of the cap or rupture which leads an intra coronary thrombus formation and a consequent acute coronary event. </p>
<p>Kristensen TS and associates [Kristensen TS et al. Prognostic Implications of Nonobstructive Coronary Plaques in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Multidetector Computed Tomography Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011; 58:502-509] evaluated non obstructive coronary plaques in those with non ST elevation myocardial infarction and followed them up. Over three hundred patients were underwent 64 slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography and coronary artery calcium scoring before conventional coronary angiography. Plaque composition and volume were measured quantitatively for all non obstructive coronary lesions. Standard guideline based invasive treatment was given. Twenty three patients had a cardiac event at a median follow up of sixteen months. Increasing amount of non calcified plaque was associated with age, male sex and diabetes mellitus. Total volume of non calcified plaque was independently associated with an increased hazard ratio. But Agatston score or the amount of calcium in the non obstructive lesions were not associated with increased risk. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2011/07/risk-of-coronary-event-with-non-obstructive-plaques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multicolour CT and gold nanoparticles for evaluation of plaque</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2010/08/multicolour-ct-and-gold-nanoparticles-for-evaluation-of-plaque/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2010/08/multicolour-ct-and-gold-nanoparticles-for-evaluation-of-plaque/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=4783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multicolor CT is the popular name for spectral computed tomography. In spectral CT system, the incident x-rays are divided into multiple energy bins and is used for multicolour [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multicolor CT is the popular name for spectral computed tomography. In spectral CT system, the incident x-rays are divided into multiple energy bins and is used for multicolour imaging. Gold high density nanoparticle contrast agent (Au-HDL) can be used for characterization of macrophage burden as they are taken up by the macrophages in the atherosclerotic plaques. A recent study published in Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):774-82 by Cormode DP et al  evaluated the use of gold nanoparticles along with multicolour CT in animal studies of atherosclerotic plaques. Multi colour CT enabled differentiation of gold nanoparticles, iodine based contrast and calcium phosphate. Gold nanoparticles were located primarily in the macrophages in the aortic sections. This combined imaging enabled characterisation of stenosis by the plaques, calcification and the macrophage burden. Macrophage rich plaques are considered as vulnerable plaques prone for rupture and producing vascular events like acute coronary syndrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2010/08/multicolour-ct-and-gold-nanoparticles-for-evaluation-of-plaque/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multi slice CT for coronary artery imaging</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2010/05/multi-slice-ct-for-coronary-artery-imaging/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2010/05/multi-slice-ct-for-coronary-artery-imaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 10:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=4587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multi slice CT (MSCT) scanners are becoming popular as a non-invasive imaging modality for screening coronary artery disease. The era of MSCT started with 4 slice scanners and [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multi slice CT (MSCT) scanners are becoming popular as a non-invasive imaging modality for screening coronary artery disease. The era of MSCT started with 4 slice scanners and progressed to the 64 slice MSCT which is commonly used now. 256 slice and 320 slice CT scanners are also being evaluated for clinical use. One of the difficulties with cardiac CT for imaging coronaries is the constant motion of the heart. This can be partly overcome by using ECG gating of the signals. Conventionally this has been done by retrospective ECG gating. This would mean that CT data is acquired through out the cardiac cycle and only those signals during a particular part of the cardiac cycle, usually a diastolic frame is used for final reconstruction of the coronaries. This would mean a much higher dose of radiation. Now prospective ECG gating is being evaluated in MSCT to reduce the radiation dose so that data acquisition is done only during the selected phase of the cardiac cycle. Prospective ECG gating can reduce the radiation dose up to 90% as compared to retrospective ECG gating. But the quality of images will come down if the heart rate or heart rate variability is high in prospective ECG gating. So also, higher body mass index (BMI) also causes lower image quality. Prospective gating can cause stair step artefacts due to patient motion on the CT table as multiple acquisitions may be needed to cover the z-axis with 64 slice CT. This is avoided in 320 slice CT as the gantry can cover the whole heart in one cycle due to better z-axis coverage. Dual source CT also gives better results. </p>
<p>Imaging of the coronaries is ideally done at lower heart rates and beta blockers are often administered to lower the heart rate during MSCT if the basal heart rate is high. As the number of slices increased, the resolution of the system to pick up more and more details of the coronary anatomy has improved. Main coronary arteries as well as side branches can be visualised well with ECG gated 64 slice CT. 320 slice CT will improve the quality of images further. The whole imaging can be completed in one cardiac cycle, even with prospective ECG gating. This would mean that patients with cardiac arrhythmias are no longer excluded from cardiac CT evaluation of the coronaries. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2010/05/multi-slice-ct-for-coronary-artery-imaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardiac CT image of pulmonary artery bifurcation</title>
		<link>http://cardiophile.org/2010/03/cardiac-ct-image-of-pulmonary-artery-bifurcation/</link>
		<comments>http://cardiophile.org/2010/03/cardiac-ct-image-of-pulmonary-artery-bifurcation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=4184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cardiac CT scan image at PA bifurcation Cardiac CT scan image at the level of the bifurcation of the main pulmonary artery (MPA) into right pulmonary artery (RPA) [..]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4 style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/PA-bifurcation1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4187" title="PA bifurcation" src="http://cardiophile.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/PA-bifurcation1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="411" /></a>Cardiac CT scan image at PA bifurcation</h4>
<p>Cardiac CT scan image at the level of the bifurcation of the main pulmonary artery (MPA) into right pulmonary artery (RPA) and left pulmonary artery (LPA). Ascending aorta (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo) are seen as two contrast filled circles (cross section) anteriorly and posteriorly. Descending aorta is just to the left and anterior of the vertebra which is seen as a semicircular radio-opaque structure. Two elliptical radioluscent structures seen between the LPA and RPA are the left and right bronchi filled with air. This shows that the level of the section is below the tracheal bifurcation. As you go down, the bronchial images can be seen diverging (not seen in this single image). This is a good view to visualise pulmonary emboli in the main pulmonary artery or its proximal branches in cases of massive pulmonary embolism. Thrombi will be seen as filling defects in this contrast filled image. Aortic aneurysms can also be picked up in this view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cardiophile.org/2010/03/cardiac-ct-image-of-pulmonary-artery-bifurcation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

